On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:43:46PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Oct 7 2007 22:50, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> >In fact mc config (ini) section is a better way.
>
> Yes, for the default colors. But /usr/share/mc/syntax/ specifies
> more of them.
Syntax highlighting, OK.
Kind of funny thing with it. One for shell in `mcedit` is much nicer, but
`emacs` is more powerful as editor(R). But both have highlighting
problems with non trivial scripts (quoiting, data here, etc). I don't
know if it will ever be fixed :).
Comprehensive highlighting of contents of diffs (or even _patched_
sources) is XXII century feature.
Anyway if anybody have anything to look onto, like more Linux C types,
bogus coding style highlighting, i'll be glad to test. And any
emacs hacks, that gurus are using will be very appreciated.
[0] emacs setup and fontlocking <ftp://flower.upol.cz/emacs/>
> >I use default blue (which is very annoying)
>
> If blue were annoying, it would not be the default Windows background
> (since Windows 2000). Then again, it's personal preference,
Emacs have black background by default. I changed foreground to green,
and it is much nicer for long runs. Blue (or any bright) background
isn't comfortable, i think.
> so I suppose you have a red/green desktop wallpaper for X11?
Black background mostly. If you know classic blackbox wm (version <=
0.62), then Rancor(80%) and Artwiz(20%) my all time styles. But i use
no X for quite some time now.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
