Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

* Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:

> > even if it were true (which it isnt), that is not an argument 
> > against including a useful change that exists now and that people 
> > are interested in.
> 
> Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years
> ago.

Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on 
lkml.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"
  - From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)
  - From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"
  - From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)"
Next by Date: Re: [ofa-general] Updated InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
Previous by thread: Re: NAK nettiquete (was Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)"
Next by thread: Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]