Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"

* Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:

> > even if it were true (which it isnt), that is not an argument 
> > against including a useful change that exists now and that people 
> > are interested in.
> 
> Coloring isn't useful. If it was, it would be implemented ~16 years
> ago.

Congratulations, this is the most stupid argument i've ever read on 
lkml.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"
    • From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)"
• Next by Date: Re: [ofa-general] Updated InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
• Previous by thread: Re: NAK nettiquete (was Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)"
• Next by thread: Re: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)" + "`Subject:' usage"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]