Re: Network slowdown due to CFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote:

> > [...] The timeslices of tasks (i.e. the time they spend on a CPU 
> > without scheduling away) is _not_ maintained directly in CFS as a 
> > per-task variable that can be "cleared", it's not the metric that 
> > drives scheduling. Yes, of course CFS too "slices up CPU time", but 
> > those slices are not the per-task variables of traditional 
> > schedulers and cannot be 'cleared'.
> 
> It's not about this comment alone, but this comment plus "no notion" 
> comment, which appears in sched-design-CFS.txt too.

ok - i've re-read it and it indeed is somewhat confusing without 
additional context. I'll improve the wording. (sched-design-CFS.txt 
needs an update anyway)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux