Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)

[Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>]

On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my
> > > > mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me.
> > > 
> > > There is noone having trouble with ncurses dependency today.
> > 
> > Who wants to meet a zombie anyway?
> 
> Finding quotes from old threads does not in any way prove your point.

This makes air hot for Roman. I want to prove my point not by words. But
have to reply with something on my side, until i have work done.

[]
> And until now you have not given one single example of real
> problems that will be solved by a total rewrite and cannot
> be solved otherwise.

If you didn't see them in that, what i've posted, then i just have to
say: i don't need to give anything. There are kvm, lguest, xen with ext2,
ext3, xfs, etc. And there's no working alternative to build/config
system. Thus, let me have my try OK? Thanks!

Bye.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/