> Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my > mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me. There is noone having trouble with ncurses dependency today. And perl is not yet mandatory for a kernel build expect for a few architectures. m4 is not used by the kernel - to my best knowledge. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
- Re: [kbuild-devel] A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
- Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
- A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/9] compat_ioctl: move common block ioctls to compat_blkdev_ioctl
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- Next by thread: Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)
- Index(es):
 |