Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> i'd suggest we go with what we have now

Ok - I'll try sending this against 2.6.23-rc8-mm2
in a couple of hours, if it goes well.

> We cannot merge it via sched.git because it has some containers 
> (or other?) dependencies, right?

This sched_load_balance flag patch collides with the cgroup
(aka container) patches if I'm not careful, yes.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux