Re: [PATCH] Use task_pid_nr() instead of pid_nr(task_pid())

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:26:06 +0400
Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are two places that do so - the cgroups subsystem 
> and the autofs code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/autofs/root.c b/fs/autofs/root.c
> index 592f640..5efff3c 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs/root.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs/root.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static struct dentry *autofs_root_lookup
>  
>  	oz_mode = autofs_oz_mode(sbi);
>  	DPRINTK(("autofs_lookup: pid = %u, pgrp = %u, catatonic = %d, "
> -				"oz_mode = %d\n", pid_nr(task_pid(current)),
> +				"oz_mode = %d\n", task_pid_nr(current),
>  				task_pgrp_nr(current), sbi->catatonic,
>  				oz_mode));
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 1e8aa53..8720881 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ static int pid_array_load(pid_t *pidarra
>  	while ((tsk = cgroup_iter_next(cont, &it))) {
>  		if (unlikely(n == npids))
>  			break;
> -		pidarray[n++] = pid_nr(task_pid(tsk));
> +		pidarray[n++] = task_pid_nr(tsk);
>  	}
>  	cgroup_iter_end(cont, &it);
>  	return n;

And more will appear over time unless we remove pid_nr() altogether.

Can we do that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux