Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24

 > I tested this by simulating a slow passive side responder, and it worked as
 > expected for those tests.  Using an MRA does add another MAD to the CM exchange,
 > which is why it is sent only after seeing a duplicate request.  Alternatively,
 > we can take the OFED module parameter patch.

What the heck, I added this for 2.6.24.  If it doesn't work out we can
back it out.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
  • RE: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
    • From: "Sean Hefty" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] New message-logging API (kprint)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes
• Previous by thread: RE: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Fix SH DMA API so it works with PVR cascade
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]