On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:14:34 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hrm... allright, tho having this "disabler" driver is butt ugly > too ... especially since it needs to whack registers in another > function, that's really quirkland :-) > Well, that issue would remain even if we put it into sdhci.c. Perhaps something can be done when sdhci is split into multiple parts, but not right now. Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Philip Langdale <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Philip Langdale <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- Prev by Date: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- Next by Date: Re: large latency on heavy NFS writeback
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- Next by thread: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..
- Index(es):