Re: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Dumazet a écrit :
Denys a écrit :
Well, i can play a bit more on "live" servers. I have now hot-swap server with full gentoo, where i can rebuild any kernel you want, with any applied patch. But it looks more like not overhead, load becoming high too "spiky", and it is not just permantenly higher. Also it is not normal that all system becoming unresposive (for example ping 127.0.0.1 becoming 300ms for period, when usage
softirq jumps to 100%).

Could you try a pristine 2.6.22.9 and some patch in secure_tcp_sequence_number() like :

--- drivers/char/random.c.orig 2007-10-01 10:18:42.000000000 +0200
+++ drivers/char/random.c 2007-10-01 10:19:58.000000000 +0200
@@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@
* That's funny, Linux has one built in! Use it!
* (Networks are faster now - should this be increased?)
*/
- seq += ktime_get_real().tv64;
+ seq += ktime_get_real().tv64 / 1000;
#if 0
printk("init_seq(%lx, %lx, %d, %d) = %d\n",
saddr, daddr, sport, dport, seq);
On 32 bits machine, replace the divide by a shift to avoid a linker error (undefined reference to `__divdi3'):
seq += ktime_get_real().tv64 >> 10;





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux