On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:28:57PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:19:27PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > Would you accept a patch which causes the deprecated sysfs
> > files/directories to disappear, even if CONFIG_SYS_DEPRECATED is
> > defined, via a boot-time parameter?
>
> How about a mount option? That way people can test without a reboot:
>
> mount -o remount,deprecated={yes,no} /sys
Unfortunatly, due to the way sysfs and kobjects are built up, this is
pretty impossible to do.
sorry,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Next by Date: Re: [3/4] dma: document dma_flags_set_dmabarrier()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Index(es):
 |