On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:19:27PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Would you accept a patch which causes the deprecated sysfs
> files/directories to disappear, even if CONFIG_SYS_DEPRECATED is
> defined, via a boot-time parameter?
How about a mount option? That way people can test without a reboot:
mount -o remount,deprecated={yes,no} /sys
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Prev by Date: Re: More E820 brokenness
- Next by Date: Re: Stardom SATA HSM violation
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
- Index(es):
 |