Re: [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:12:02PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> This test seems to be unnecessary since we always have rootfs mounted before
> calling a usermodehelper.

Are you sure this is true?  I thought we called the usermode helper for
hotplug _very_ early in the boot sequence when the device tree starts to
get populated.

But things could have changed from the 2.5 days when this was first
added, if so, nevermind me :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/10] Use struct path in struct nameidata
    • From: [email protected]
  • [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: [patch] rename signalfd_siginfo fields
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add iSCSI iBFT support.
• Previous by thread: [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]