On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> So the OpenBSD man page seems to be in the minority here. Any portable
> code can not assume that CWD changes. And changing the Linux behaviour
> now would be a rather big change which might break userspace. And yes,
> there are applications that rely on this, I've used it when building
> software for cross compiling.
Changing Linux behavior would violate the POSIX and SuSV2
specifications; the standards explicitly state that the working
directory will NOT change. And standards adherance is important; we
break them only if we have a d*mn good reason. And trying to make
chroot() something which it is not (i.e., a secure jail) is certainly
not a good enough reason.
Can we please end this thread now? And can we put in a Kernel FAQ
saying that this is not something which is NOT up for discussion?
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
