>> When this is sorted out, should I keep the previous patch [1] applied >> as well? > > That doesn't hurt. OK, I've used just the latter patch (because I somehow believe the first one lowers the probability of bad behavior), so let's see if kswapd consumes CPU again. I don't have any test patter to trigger that CPU usage, though... Cheers and thanks for your time, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Jan Kundrát <[email protected]>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Jan Kundrát <[email protected]>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Jan Kundrát <[email protected]>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] NCR53C8XX: Remove deprecated IRQ flags (SA_*)
- Next by Date: [RFC] QoS power Management enabling patch set
- Previous by thread: Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- Next by thread: Linux 2.6.23-rc8
- Index(es):