Rik van Riel wrote: > Could you try out the attached patch, too? Sorry, I wasn't able to apply it against 2.6.22-gentoo-r3 and vanilla 2.6.22.7; I don't have the "order" member in the "struct scan_control" and also the bit about "if (sync_writeback == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC && may_enter_fs)" was missing so there was no "else" branch to add (and it seemd pretty significant to me). What version should I patch against? When this is sorted out, should I keep the previous patch [1] applied as well? [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00033.html Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- References:
- kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Jan Kundrát <jkt@gentoo.org>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Jan Kundrát <jkt@gentoo.org>
- Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
- kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- Prev by Date: Re: subsystem_unregister() breakage in -mm
- Next by Date: Re: [discuss] 2.6.23-rc8-mm1, -rc7-mm1 kill audio on HP nx6325
- Previous by thread: Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- Next by thread: Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
- Index(es):
![]() |