On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:10:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So the patch below just removes the is_same_group() condition. But i can
> still see bad (and obvious) latencies with Mike's 2-hogs test:
>
> taskset 01 perl -e 'while (1) {}' &
> nice -19 taskset 02 perl -e 'while (1) {}' &
>
> So something's amiss.
While I try recreating this myself, I wonder if this patch helps?
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: current/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ current/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -794,7 +794,8 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *r
static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr), *pcfs_rq;
+ struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se, *pse = &p->se;
if (unlikely(rt_prio(p->prio))) {
update_rq_clock(rq);
@@ -802,11 +803,19 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct
resched_task(curr);
return;
}
- if (is_same_group(curr, p)) {
- s64 delta = curr->se.vruntime - p->se.vruntime;
- if (delta > (s64)sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity)
- resched_task(curr);
+ for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ pcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(pse);
+
+ if (cfs_rq == pcfs_rq) {
+ s64 delta = se->vruntime - pse->vruntime;
+
+ if (delta > (s64)sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity)
+ resched_task(curr);
+ break;
+ }
+ pse = pse->parent;
}
}
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
