Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:10 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>  no news is good news.

Darn, have news: latency thing isn't dead.  Two busy loops, one at nice
0 pinned to CPU0, and one at nice 19 pinned to CPU1 produced the
latencies below for nice -5 Xorg.  Didn't kill the box though.

se.wait_max              :            10.068169
se.wait_max              :             7.465334
se.wait_max              :           135.501816
se.wait_max              :             0.884483
se.wait_max              :           144.218955
se.wait_max              :           128.578376
se.wait_max              :            93.975768
se.wait_max              :             4.965965
se.wait_max              :           113.655533
se.wait_max              :             4.301075

sched_debug (attached) is.. strange.

	-Mike

Attachment: sched_debug.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [git] CFS-devel, latest code
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more} ARM/StrongARM
• Previous by thread: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
• Next by thread: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]