On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:10 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > no news is good news. Darn, have news: latency thing isn't dead. Two busy loops, one at nice 0 pinned to CPU0, and one at nice 19 pinned to CPU1 produced the latencies below for nice -5 Xorg. Didn't kill the box though. se.wait_max : 10.068169 se.wait_max : 7.465334 se.wait_max : 135.501816 se.wait_max : 0.884483 se.wait_max : 144.218955 se.wait_max : 128.578376 se.wait_max : 93.975768 se.wait_max : 4.965965 se.wait_max : 113.655533 se.wait_max : 4.301075 sched_debug (attached) is.. strange. -Mike
Attachment:
sched_debug.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- References:
- [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- Prev by Date: Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more} ARM/StrongARM
- Previous by thread: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- Next by thread: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
- Index(es):