On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:47 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:13 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > > [...] Latencies of up to 336ms hit me during the recompile (make -j3),
> > > > with nothing else running. Since reboot, latencies are, so far, very
> > > > very nice. [...]
> > >
> > > 'very very nice' == 'best ever' ? :-)
> >
> > Yes. Very VERY nice feel.
>
> cool :-)
>
> Maybe there's more to come: if we can get CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED to work
> properly then your Xorg will have a load-independent 50% of CPU time all
> to itself. (Group scheduling is quite impressive already: i can log in
> as root without feeling _any_ effect from a perpetual 'hackbench 100'
> running as uid mingo. Fork bombs no more.) Will the Amarok gforce plugin
> like that CPU time splitup? (or is most of the gforce overhead under
> your user uid?)
I run everything as root (naughty me), so I'd have to change my evil
ways to reap the benefits. (I'll do that to test, but it's unlikely to
ever become a permanent habit here) Amarok/Gforce will definitely like
the user split as long as latency is low. Visualizations are not only
bandwidth hungry, they're extremely latency sensitive.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
