Re: [patch 1/2] Enable link power management for ata drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, roel wrote:
> 
>>> +	if (!(ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_IPM) || !ata_dev_enabled(dev)) {
>> 	if (!((ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_IPM) && ata_dev_enabled(dev))) {
> 
> int foo(int i, int j) {
>         
>         return !(i & 8) || !j;
> }
> 
> int moo(int i, int j) {
>         
>         return !((i & 8) && j);
> }
> 
> 
> gcc -O2 -S:
> 
> 
> .globl foo
>         .type   foo, @function
> foo:
>         shrl    $3, %edi
>         xorl    $1, %edi
>         testl   %esi, %esi
>         sete    %al
>         orl     %eax, %edi
>         andl    $1, %edi
>         movl    %edi, %eax
>         ret
> .globl moo
>         .type   moo, @function
> moo:
>         shrl    $3, %edi
>         xorl    $1, %edi
>         testl   %esi, %esi
>         sete    %al
>         orl     %eax, %edi
>         andl    $1, %edi
>         movl    %edi, %eax
>         ret

Indeed, no difference, except for the eye. 

do you not consider it an improvement or do you not want to change it?
or
don't you consider it an improvement and want to change it?

Never mind. Disregard if you please.

> - Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux