On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:12:32 +0200
roel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > #define ata_id_cdb_intr(id) (((id)[0] & 0x60) == 0x20)
> > +#define ata_id_has_hipm(id) \
> > + ( (((id)[76] != 0x0000) && ((id)[76] != 0xffff)) && \
> > + ((id)[76] & (1 << 9)) )
> ^
> |
> are you sure this
> should be 76?
Yes.
>
> we can also change the first statement a bit:
> (!(((id)[76] == 0x0000) || ((id)[76] == 0xffff)) && \
>
>
> > +#define ata_id_has_dipm(id) \
> > + ( (((id)[76] != 0x0000) && ((id)[76] != 0xffff)) && \
>
> and:
> (!(((id)[76] == 0x0000) || ((id)[76] == 0xffff)) && \
I feel this is equivalent functionality and not as readable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]