On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:30:59 -0700 Philip Langdale <[email protected]> wrote: > > This remains confusing. I went and investigated and the SD disable > bit is 0x20. The one lspci dump from the IFL90 shows that 0x80 is > set by default, but setting this on my laptop did not disable the > SD controller. I will need to collect more information from owners > to find out what's really going on. > > Do you want to wait on this before taking this patch? > Preferably. But if you can't figure it out until it is time to merge things upstream, then I'll go with what we have right now. Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Philip Langdale <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- From: Philip Langdale <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- Prev by Date: Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/22] NFS: Use local caching
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
- Next by thread: [PATCH] alpha: beautify vmlinux.lds
- Index(es):
 |