Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller

Pierre Ossman wrote:
>>
> 
> Patch looks ok. Please try to sort out that completely disabled
> controller that was reported first though.

This remains confusing. I went and investigated and the SD disable
bit is 0x20. The one lspci dump from the IFL90 shows that 0x80 is
set by default, but setting this on my laptop did not disable the
SD controller. I will need to collect more information from owners
to find out what's really going on.

Do you want to wait on this before taking this patch?

--phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
    • From: Philip Langdale <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] lockdep: validate rcu_dereference() vs rcu_read_lock()
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/5] VFS: pass open file to ->xattr()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]