On 09/21/2007 05:39 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > This sounds an awful lot like the same problem I reported with fsck > hanging. I believe that Hugh had a candidate patch for that, which was > related to dirty tracking limits. It seems that that patch tested, and > acked by Peter. All on lkml under: > > 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 -- mkfs stuck in 'D' > Unfortunately that whole thread is about fixing bugs in an already much-changed balance_dirty_pages() in -mm. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/22] Introduce credential record
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/9] RCU: Preemptible RCU
- Previous by thread: Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- Next by thread: Re: Processes spinning forever, apparently in lock_timer_base()?
- Index(es):
 |