Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists

--
>
> This has been wondering me some time. Kernel oopses also use [<%p>],
> but what really for are two sort of braces needed?


I believe the notation of [<some-hex-number>] has always been a
representation of instruction pointer.  Seems that's what's used for all
outputs of instruction pointers that I've seen (well most really).

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Concerns about the console handover
• Next by Date: Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]