Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists

--
>
> This has been wondering me some time. Kernel oopses also use [<%p>],
> but what really for are two sort of braces needed?


I believe the notation of [<some-hex-number>] has always been a
representation of instruction pointer.  Seems that's what's used for all
outputs of instruction pointers that I've seen (well most really).

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
  - From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Concerns about the console handover
Next by Date: Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]