On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:40:55AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 21:48 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > I don't know if this is relevant, but 4294966399 in nr_uninterruptible
> > for cpu#0 equals -897, exactly the negation of cpu1.nr_uninterruptible.
> > I don't know if this rings a bell for someone or if it's a completely
> > useless comment, but just in case...
>
> A task can block on one cpu, and wake up on another, which isn't
> tracked, hence the fishy looking numbers. The true nr_uninterruptible
> is the sum of all.
OK, thanks Mike for this clarification.
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
- Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]