Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes

On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> The scenario which was previously cured was this:
> taskset -c 1 nice -n 0 ./massive_intr 2 9999
> taskset -c 1 nice -n 5 ./massive_intr 2 9999
> click link
> (http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~shubu/talks/cachescrub-prdc2004.ppt) to bring
> up browser and OpenOffice Impress.
> 
> Xorg (at nice -5 + above scenario) latency samples:
> se.wait_max              :            57985337
> se.wait_max              :            25163510
> se.wait_max              :            37005538
> se.wait_max              :            66986511
> se.wait_max              :            53990868
> se.wait_max              :            80976761
> se.wait_max              :            96967501
> se.wait_max              :            80989254
> se.wait_max              :            53990897
> se.wait_max              :           181963905
> se.wait_max              :            85985181

To be doubly sure of the effect on the pinned tasks + migrating Xorg
scenario, I just ran the above test 10 times with virgin devel source.
Maximum Xorg latency was 20ms.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
    • From: Tong Li <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
    • From: dimm <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
    • From: Tong Li <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: iso9660 vs udf
• Next by Date: Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the vmalloc boundaries
• Previous by thread: Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
• Next by thread: Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]