Re: [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> Cross-cache-line, sure.  But what about just not sizeof aligned?  If its
> enough to avoid cross-cache-line, then that's simpler.
> 

Not really.  It pretty much comes down to the same problem.

> Which is something I was going to comment on: Mathieu, you try to align
> the constant itself, but you don't prevent the instruction overall from
> crossing a cache line.  Given how delicate all this stuff is, it seems
> like a good idea to do that.

Given how delicate all his stuff is, it would be interesting to know the
magnitude of the expected payoff, which I personally don't remember seeing.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux