Re: iso9660 vs udf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.

 I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb). Also try:

     # blkid -c /dev/null /dev/cdrom
     # /lib/udev/vol_id  /dev/cdrom

 Maybe vol_id provides better information -- the udf/iso code in
 libblkid seems poorer that in libvolume_id.

> If anybody feels responsible for mount and/or this kernel area
> we might discuss.

 mount(8) --> [email protected]


 Karel Zak  <[email protected]>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux