On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> An extra branch is created on MMIO-only devices on read/writes on the
> IO_COND macro using this interface -- or is this optimized out?
Umm. Does anybody actually have any performance numbers?
The thing is, those things are *cheap* compared to the IO. And any
high-performance device will be using DMA for the real IO, so we're not
generally even talking about any performance-critical stuff.
Quite frankly, if performance is a _real_ reason to avoid
ioread*/iowrite*, I'll happily accept read*/write*, but it would be needed
to be backed up by real numbers. Can you even measure it?
I would definitely *not* encourage the notion that people should use
readl/writel because of "performance reasons". That may be valid for some
fbcon driver, but those drivers go to other extremes (ie they use
"__raw_writel()" etc, and MTRR's etc).
If you don't use write-combining memory regions, the performance argument
is not really valid.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
