On 9/18/07, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > ACK -- driver developers use this just to save themselves a few lines
> > from calling pci_resource_start() and friends. How about having an
> > inline which does what pci_iomap() does except it doesn't call
> > ioport_map() ? I am just not sure where this would go..
>
> I'm not understanding what the problem is?
>
> Why don't these people just use "ioread*()/iowrite*()"?
>
> In other words, the whole point of *not* using "read*/write*()" is that
> you get a whole slew of much nicer interfaces.
>
> So can people explain this fundamental issue? Why do people insist on
> using the old interfaces (and matching them with the new setup)?
An extra branch is created on MMIO-only devices on read/writes on the
IO_COND macro using this interface -- or is this optimized out?
Luis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
