On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > Here is the incremental small cleanup patch. > > Remove kamlloc usages in jbd/jbd2 and consistently use jbd_kmalloc/jbd2_malloc. Shouldn't we kill jbd_kmalloc instead? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- References:
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API
- Next by Date: Re: Wasting our Freedom
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
- Index(es):
 |