Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c

David Miller wrote:
> You've got to be kidding me.
>
> 104 patches is way over the top, post them in smaller chunks
> please instead of killing vger.kernel.org as it has to crunch
> out every single one of these 104 patches to several thousand
> recipients.
>
>   

I can understand the load on the humans (and will split into several
rounds in the future), but why is vger.kernel.org so badly affected? 
Shouldn't the mta throttle itself instead of dying?

Just curious.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 000/104] KVM patch queue for the 2.6.24 merge window
  - From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
  - From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: Update Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
Next by thread: [PATCH 047/104] KVM: Remove unneeded kvm_dev_open and kvm_dev_release functions.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]