Re: [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c

You've got to be kidding me.

104 patches is way over the top, post them in smaller chunks
please instead of killing vger.kernel.org as it has to crunch
out every single one of these 104 patches to several thousand
recipients.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 000/104] KVM patch queue for the 2.6.24 merge window
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: patch/option to wipe memory at boot?
• Next by Date: Linux Network Load Balancing is out!
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
• Next by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 045/104] KVM: Fix defined but not used warning in drivers/kvm/vmx.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]