Sam Ravnborg schrieb: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:37:11PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >> what about "devel-pkg" instead? that would match fedora's >> "kernel-devel" naming convention. > > Does > make devel-pkg > in the kernel make you think: > "This is a minimum package to build an external module". > > I guess not. From an rpm-based distribution background, it does, actually. You typically have to install a "xyzzy-devel" package before you can compile something related to "xyzzy", so it is quite natural to look for a "kernel-devel" package providing whatever is necessary to build kernel modules; and "cd kernel ; make devel-pkg" reads almost literally like "make kernel-devel.rpm". -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB autosuspend fixes for 2.6.23-rc6
- Next by Date: [BUG][2.6.23-rc6] Badness at arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:202
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add a 'minimal tree install' target
- Index(es):
 |