On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:09:18PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi Sam! > > On 12.09.2007 22:03, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >> I think the Fedora approach has many benefits -- I always wondered why > >> it never went upstream like a "make install_develstuff" that install all > >> the needed bits to > >> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/ > > Last time I saw the patch is was to ugly to consider. > > Do you have a pointer to that patch? See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/12/331 Chris Wedgwood posted it today. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@leemhuis.info>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- References:
- Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Dan Stromberg <dstromberglists@gmail.com>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Dan Stromberg <dstromberglists@gmail.com>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@leemhuis.info>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@leemhuis.info>
- Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add DMA engine driver for Freescale MPC85xx processors.
- Next by Date: Re: Possible hang inside interrupt handler on sata_promise.
- Previous by thread: Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- Next by thread: Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
- Index(es):
 |