Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?

Hi knurd.

> I think the Fedora approach has many benefits -- I always wondered why
> it never went upstream like a "make install_develstuff" that install all
> the needed bits to
>   /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/

Last time I saw the patch is was to ugly to consider.
Now that is maybe a year ago and I would be happy to take another look
should someone submit it to me.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]>

References:
- Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
  - From: Dan Stromberg <[email protected]>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
  - From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
  - From: Dan Stromberg <[email protected]>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
  - From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
- Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: libata not working for sis5533
Next by Date: Re: ata_piix, laptop cdrom, ICH7: EH, limiting speed to PIO
Previous by thread: Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
Next by thread: Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]