Re: timerfd redux — Linux Kernel

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:13:59 +0200 "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andrew,
> 
> > > 3. possible solutions
> > 
> > I don't think we'll have this settled and coded in time for 2.6.23.  So I
> > think the prudent thing to do is to push this back to 2.6.24 and not offer
> > sys_timerfd() in 2.6.23.
> 
> Did you want a patch to remove the syscall number for now,
> or will you do that?
> 

Please send one over sometime.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- timerfd redux
  - From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Re: timerfd redux
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: timerfd redux
  - From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC)
Next by Date: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
Previous by thread: Re: timerfd redux
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/4] Net: ath5k, comment some EEPROM registers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]