Re: timerfd redux

Andrew,

> > 3. possible solutions
> 
> I don't think we'll have this settled and coded in time for 2.6.23.  So I
> think the prudent thing to do is to push this back to 2.6.24 and not offer
> sys_timerfd() in 2.6.23.

Did you want a patch to remove the syscall number for now,
or will you do that?

Cheers,

Michael
-- 
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 

Want to help with man page maintenance?  
Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages , 
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source 
files for 'FIXME'.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: timerfd redux
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
    • From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
    • From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
    • From: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
  • timerfd redux
    • From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
  • Re: timerfd redux
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin arch: add some missing syscall
• Previous by thread: Re: timerfd redux
• Next by thread: Re: timerfd redux
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]