Re: timerfd redux — Linux Kernel

Andrew,

> > 3. possible solutions
> 
> I don't think we'll have this settled and coded in time for 2.6.23.  So I
> think the prudent thing to do is to push this back to 2.6.24 and not offer
> sys_timerfd() in 2.6.23.

Did you want a patch to remove the syscall number for now,
or will you do that?

Cheers,

Michael
-- 
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 

Want to help with man page maintenance?  
Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages , 
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source 
files for 'FIXME'.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: timerfd redux
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- timerfd redux
  - From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>
- Re: timerfd redux
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] Blackfin arch bug fixing for 2.6.23-rc6
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin arch: add some missing syscall
Previous by thread: Re: timerfd redux
Next by thread: Re: timerfd redux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]