On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:12:02PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > Yes. To emphasise this code doesn't support real-time tasks in a container, I > am returning -ENOTSUP when trying to move a rt-task into a container. s/ENOTSUP/EINVAL -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Prev by Date: 2.6.23-rc6-git1 -- termios *_1 compile failures on powerpc
- Next by Date: Re: hci_sock.c build failure
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Index(es):
 |