On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr) > >+#endif > > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller? *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO! Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- References:
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][Intel-IOMMU] Fix for IOMMU early crash
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Index(es):
 |