Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr)
> >+#endif
> 
> cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?

*shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!

Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
  - From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][Intel-IOMMU] Fix for IOMMU early crash
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]