Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches

"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek":
> So, if I understand correctly, you create the entire block as if you were
> going to write to disk? Unionfs keeps the data in a linked list.

Basically yes.
But the dir block in cache has no hole which is contiguous memory.


Junjiro Okajima
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
    • From: Bharata B Rao <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
    • From: Bharata B Rao <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
    • From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] fs: define file_fsync() even for CONFIG_BLOCK=n
• Next by Date: [PATCH -mm] ssb: Make pcmciahost depend on PCMCIA=y
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]