Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches

"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek":
> So, if I understand correctly, you create the entire block as if you were
> going to write to disk? Unionfs keeps the data in a linked list.

Basically yes.
But the dir block in cache has no hole which is contiguous memory.


Junjiro Okajima
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
  - From: Bharata B Rao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
  - From: Bharata B Rao <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
  - From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] fs: define file_fsync() even for CONFIG_BLOCK=n
Next by Date: [PATCH -mm] ssb: Make pcmciahost depend on PCMCIA=y
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]