Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- [PATCH] Document non-semantics of atomic_read() and atomic_set()
- From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Prev by Date: Re: regression: fireware causes oops during system
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC] doc: about email clients for Linux kernel patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document non-semantics of atomic_read() and atomic_set()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Index(es):
 |