On 9/11/07, Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And "group" is more or less implied by the fact that it's in the > > containers/control groups filesystem. > > "control groups" is the name of your framework. right ? That's the main contender for the new name, to replace "task containers" since there were enough objections. (Renamed patches coming out today, I hope). Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Prev by Date: OOPS in __copy_user_zeroing_intel
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Move the definition of pr_err() into kernel.h
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
- Index(es):
 |