Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

On Sep 10 2007 22:58, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:53:34PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>> > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?
>> 
>> *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
>> would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!
>> 
>> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.
>
>s/cptctlr/cpuctlr !

Captain Controller to the rescue!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 -- powerpc per_cpu__cpu_sibling_map compile failure
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]