> I can see where you're coming from, but logically, this is wrong.
> There's a huge slew of enterprise machines that only have DVD on SATA.
... and enterprise systems don't really care about a few KB more of code.
In fact you definitely want to have SATA compiled in in case you need
to recover the machine later when the SAN is down.
> On the other hand, all of these machines will have SCSI disk devices on
> various other transports, so no harm is done, it's just an inelegant
> solution.
Do you know of a better one?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
