Re: [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu

On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 12:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> Actually, list_for_each_continue_rcu() needs to be removed in favor of
> your new list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu().  There are currently only
> two users as of 2.6.22.  One of them immediately does a list_entry(),
> and the other would convert easily as well.  So please let me know
> when this gets accepted!  ;-)

Heh, ok, I won't add the text to that macro if you want to remove it
anyway. I guess I'll add your paragraph and ... hmm. what do I do with
it? Who's responsible for list.h? Can I push this through John Linville
and Dave Miller so I can get the fix into his tree easily without
synchronisation?

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: crash while playing bzflag
• Next by Date: Re: USB Key light on/off state depending on mount
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
• Next by thread: [PATCH] list.h: add list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]