On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:37 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Ian Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example.
>
> I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount. Any
> flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must
> either result in a new superblock or be ignored.
>
> David
We currently ignore remount requests that attempt to change the NFS
mount parameters. This is not new behaviour, BTW: it has always been the
case, and nobody has ever requested it.
The ro flag is different, and I agree that it should be moved to the
vfsmount structure. I'm hoping Dave Hansen's patches will be ready for
merging soon...
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
