Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

Ian Kent <[email protected]> wrote:

> But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example.

I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount.  Any
flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must
either result in a new superblock or be ignored.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: "Hua Zhong" <[email protected]>
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: request for information about the "ath5k" licensing
• Next by Date: Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22
• Previous by thread: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
• Next by thread: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]