Re: Cache not being reclaimed?

[Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>]

On ons, 2007-09-05 at 05:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:28:07 +0200 Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com> wrote:
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > I have just had a quite unexpected 'low memory situation'...
> > 
> > This is a AMD64 machine with 2 gig memory, running 64 bit userland.
> > 
> > Kernel: 2.6.23-rc3-git10, updating to -rc5-* as soon as i can.
> > I'm using SLUB:s
> > 
> > 
> > To me, this looks odd... I thought that any cached memory would be
> > reclamed but it was always full.
> > 
> > Ideas?
> > 
> > One example from dmesg:
> > swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
> > 
> > Call Trace:
> >  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8026c7ef>] __alloc_pages+0x30f/0x330
> >  [<ffffffff8028a0a1>] __slab_alloc+0x141/0x590
> >  [<ffffffff805a5937>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40
> >  [<ffffffff805a5937>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40
> >  [<ffffffff8028b470>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0xa0/0xc0
> >  [<ffffffff805a4b3f>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x150
> >  [<ffffffff805a5937>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40
> >  [<ffffffff88010945>] :sky2:sky2_rx_alloc+0x25/0xf0
> >  [<ffffffff88013b0c>] :sky2:sky2_poll+0x6dc/0xcf0
> >  [<ffffffff805e5f60>] tcp_delack_timer+0x0/0x210
> >  [<ffffffff805ac38a>] net_rx_action+0x8a/0x140
> >  [<ffffffff80242ac9>] __do_softirq+0x69/0xe0
> >  [<ffffffff8020cd9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> >  [<ffffffff8020eb75>] do_softirq+0x35/0x90
> >  [<ffffffff8020ede0>] do_IRQ+0x80/0x100
> >  [<ffffffff8020ad00>] default_idle+0x0/0x40
> >  [<ffffffff8020c121>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> >  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8020ad29>] default_idle+0x29/0x40
> >  [<ffffffff8020ade1>] cpu_idle+0xa1/0xf0
> > 
> 
> An order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocation can fail, and networking should recover
> from it.

Well, this isn't only networking, It started with all the apps running
and ended up with a pretty basic desktop with almost nothing running...
(due to continued freezes that caused me to shut down more and more
programs)

> If this is happening a lot then someting might have been broken.  Do you
> have reason to believe that the frequency of this happening has inreased?

I have never, to my knowledge, had this happen before... 

I just happened to start a few downloads with rtorrent and watched the
machine slow down to a crawl... All this with over a gig in cache.

The machine was actually deadlocked for almost a minute at one time.

Top memory usage:
  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                  
 2395 pomac     20   0  440m 289m 238m S    2 14.4  32:56.54 rtorrent
21647 root      20   0  203m 120m  10m S    1  6.0 569:45.31 X                        
 2351 pomac     20   0  170m 111m  53m S    0  5.5  15:43.66 rtorrent          

At peak time, one of the rtorrent processes consumed more, but i still
had 1.x gig as cache, which imho should have been reclaimed.

vmstat now:
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
 0  0 365204  16628  30644 1445316    2    1   362    92   18   21  4  2 91  3

PS. I have a dmesg dump from the incident, it's not long enough to
contain all but it could be seen as a snapshot...
DS.

-- 
Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part